Skip to contents

Feature Importance Method Class

Feature Importance Method Class

References

Nadeau C, Bengio Y (2003). “Inference for the Generalization Error.” Machine Learning, 52(3), 239–281. doi:10.1023/A:1024068626366 . Molnar C, Freiesleben T, König G, Herbinger J, Reisinger T, Casalicchio G, Wright M, Bischl B (2023). “Relating the Partial Dependence Plot and Permutation Feature Importance to the Data Generating Process.” In Longo L (ed.), Explainable Artificial Intelligence, 456–479. ISBN 978-3-031-44064-9, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44064-9_24 .

Public fields

label

(character(1)) Method label.

task

(mlr3::Task)

learner

(mlr3::Learner)

measure

(mlr3::Measure)

resampling

(mlr3::Resampling), instantiated upon construction.

resample_result

(mlr3::ResampleResult) of the original learner and task, used for baseline scores.

features

(character: NULL) Features of interest. By default, importances will be computed for each feature in task, but optionally this can be restricted to at least one feature. Ignored if groups is specified.

groups

(list: NULL) A (named) list of features (names or indices as in task). If groups is specified, features is ignored. Importances will be calculated for group of features at a time, e.g., in PFI not one but the group of features will be permuted at each step. Analogously in WVIM, each group of features will be left out (or in) for each model refit. Not all methods support groups (e.g., SAGE).

param_set

(paradox::ps())

predictions

(data.table) Feature-specific prediction objects provided for some methods (PFI, WVIM). Contains columns for feature of interest, resampling iteration, refit or perturbation iteration, and mlr3::Prediction objects.

Methods


Method new()

Creates a new instance of this R6 class. This is typically intended for use by derived classes.

Usage

FeatureImportanceMethod$new(
  task,
  learner,
  measure = NULL,
  resampling = NULL,
  features = NULL,
  groups = NULL,
  param_set = paradox::ps(),
  label
)

Arguments

task, learner, measure, resampling, features, groups, param_set, label

Used to set fields


Method compute()

Compute feature importance scores

Usage

FeatureImportanceMethod$compute(store_backends = TRUE)

Arguments

store_backends

(logical(1): TRUE) Whether to store backends.


Method importance()

Get aggregated importance scores. The stored measure object's aggregator (default: mean) will be used to aggregated importance scores across resampling iterations and, depending on the method use, permutations (PerturbationImportance or refits LOCO).

Usage

FeatureImportanceMethod$importance(
  relation = NULL,
  standardize = FALSE,
  ci_method = c("none", "raw", "nadeau_bengio", "quantile"),
  conf_level = 0.95,
  alternative = c("greater", "two.sided"),
  ...
)

Arguments

relation

(character(1)) How to relate perturbed scores to originals ("difference" or "ratio"). If NULL, uses stored parameter value. This is only applicable for methods where importance is based on some relation between baseline and post-modification loss, i.e. PerturbationImportance methods such as PFI or WVIM / LOCO. Not available for SAGE methods.

standardize

(logical(1): FALSE) If TRUE, importances are standardized by the highest score so all scores fall in [-1, 1].

ci_method

(character(1): "none") Which confidence interval estimation method to use, defaulting to omitting variance estimation ("none"). If "raw", uncorrected (too narrow) CIs are provided purely for informative purposes. If "nadeau_bengio", variance correction is performed according to Nadeau & Bengio (2003) as suggested by Molnar et al. (2023). If "quantile", empirical quantiles are used to construct confidence-like intervals. These methods are model-agnostic and rely on suitable resamplings, e.g. subsampling with 15 repeats for "nadeau_bengio". See details.

conf_level

(numeric(1): 0.95) Confidence level to use for confidence interval construction when ci_method != "none".

alternative

(character(1): "greater") Type of alternative hypothesis for statistical tests. "greater" tests H0: importance <= 0 vs H1: importance > 0 (one-sided). "two.sided" tests H0: importance = 0 vs H1: importance != 0. Only used when ci_method != "none".

...

Additional arguments passed to specialized methods, if any.

Details

Confidence Interval Methods

The parametric methods ("raw", "nadeau_bengio") return standard error (se), test statistic (statistic), p-value (p.value), and confidence bounds (conf_lower, conf_upper). The "quantile" method returns only lower and upper bounds.

"raw": Uncorrected (!) t-test

Uses a standard t-test assuming independence of resampling iterations.

  • SE = sd(resampling scores) / sqrt(n_iters)

  • Test statistic: t = importance / SE with df = n_iters - 1

  • P-value: From t-distribution (one-sided or two-sided depending on alternative)

  • CIs: importance +/- qt(1 - alpha, df) * SE

Warning: These CIs are too narrow because resampling iterations share training data and are not independent. This method is included only for demonstration purposes.

"nadeau_bengio": Corrected t-test

Applies the Nadeau & Bengio (2003) correction to account for correlation between resampling iterations due to overlapping training sets.

  • Correction factor: (1/n_iters + n_test/n_train)

  • SE = sqrt(correction_factor * var(resampling scores))

  • Test statistic and p-value: As in "raw", but with corrected SE

Recommended with bootstrap or subsampling (>= 10 iterations).

"quantile": Non-parametric empirical method

Uses the resampling distribution directly without parametric assumptions.

  • CIs: Empirical quantiles of the resampling distribution

This method does not provide se, statistic, or p.value.

Method-Specific CI Methods

Some importance methods provide additional CI methods tailored to their approach:

  • CFI: Adds "cpi" (Conditional Predictive Impact), which uses observation-wise loss differences with holdout resampling. Supports t-test, Wilcoxon, Fisher permutation, and binomial tests. See Watson & Wright (2021).

Practical Recommendations

Variance estimates for importance scores are biased due to the resampling procedure. Molnar et al. (2023) suggest using the Nadeau & Bengio correction with approximately 15 iterations of subsampling.

Bootstrapping can cause information leakage with learners that bootstrap internally (e.g., Random Forests), as observations may appear in both train and test sets. Prefer subsampling in such cases:

PFI$new(
  task = sim_dgp_interactions(n = 1000),
  learner = lrn("regr.ranger", num.trees = 100),
  measure = msr("regr.mse"),
  resampling = rsmp("subsampling", repeats = 15),
  n_repeats = 20
)

The "nadeau_bengio" correction was validated for PFI; its use with other methods like LOCO or SAGE is experimental.

Returns

(data.table) Aggregated importance scores with columns "feature", "importance", and depending on ci_method also "se", "statistic", "p.value", "conf_lower", "conf_upper".


Method obs_loss()

Calculate observation-wise importance scores.

Requires that $compute() was run and that measure is decomposable and has an observation-wise loss (Measure$obs_loss()) associated with it. This is not the case for measure like classif.auc, which is not decomposable.

Usage

FeatureImportanceMethod$obs_loss(relation = NULL)

Arguments

relation

(character(1)) How to relate perturbed scores to originals ("difference" or "ratio"). If NULL, uses stored parameter value. This is only applicable for methods where importance is based on some relation between baseline and post-modification loss, i.e. PerturbationImportance methods such as PFI or WVIM / LOCO. Not available for SAGE methods.

Returns

(data.table) Observation-wise losses and importance scores with columns "feature", "iter_rsmp", "iter_repeat" (if applicable), "row_ids", "loss_baseline", "loss_post", and "obs_importance".


Method reset()

Resets all stored fields populated by $compute: $resample_result, $scores, $obs_losses, and $predictions.

Usage

FeatureImportanceMethod$reset()


Method print()

Print importance scores

Usage

FeatureImportanceMethod$print(...)

Arguments

...

Passed to print()


Method scores()

Calculate importance scores for each resampling iteration and sub-iterations (iter_rsmp in PFI for example).

Iteration-wise importance are computed on the fly depending on the chosen relation (difference or ratio) to avoid re-computation if only a different relation is needed.

Usage

FeatureImportanceMethod$scores(relation = NULL)

Arguments

relation

(character(1)) How to relate perturbed scores to originals ("difference" or "ratio"). If NULL, uses stored parameter value. This is only applicable for methods where importance is based on some relation between baseline and post-modification loss, i.e. PerturbationImportance methods such as PFI or WVIM / LOCO. Not available for SAGE methods.

Returns

(data.table) Iteration-wise importance scores with columns for "feature", iteration indices, baseline and post-modification scores, and "importance".


Method clone()

The objects of this class are cloneable with this method.

Usage

FeatureImportanceMethod$clone(deep = FALSE)

Arguments

deep

Whether to make a deep clone.